From Our Readers
Peninsula News – Thursday, February 14, 2008
Stoltz is committed
To the Editor:
In a recent letter to the editor (Feb. 7), comments were made
concerning the motives for the name change for The Avenue of the
Peninsula and the viability and desirability of the center in
general. As the owners of this center, we were surprised a member of
the community views one of the main gathering places and their
community in such a negative light Our experience on the Peninsula
has been entirely the opposite. We have felt a very warm welcome
here and are proud to be a part of this community. In the 15 busy
months that Stoltz has owned the center, our occupancy has grown as
we have opened nine new businesses - two are currently under
construction and four are getting ready to start construction soon.
To clarify, when Stoltz Management purchased the center, the name
change was a requirement of terms of the purchase of the property
with the seller. “The Avenue” was a signature name of the previous
owner's shopping center portfolio. It has become common practice
among retail developers to have a “signature” name.
The center provides more than just retail to the surrounding
residents. Without this center, the residents would have to drive
off the Hill to obtain these services and all the other amenities it
provides. The Avenue of the Peninsula offers services such as
doctor's offices and educational facilities, family attractions such
as the theater and the new health and wellness center, and a
gathering place for community events such as the tree lighting,
music and theatrical performances. Stoltz Management is very proud
of their investment and the opportunity to serve the unique and
outstanding Peninsula community, and Stoltz's commitment is long
term. It is our goal to make this center a positive and integral
part of the community. Therefore, we asked the community to vote on
a future name for the shopping center, which serves them in so many
different aspects of their lives.
We have received hundreds of responses from enthusiastic residents
who are actively taking part in the center naming. We look forward
to announcing the new center name and thank everyone who has taken
the time and effort to vote for their name choice.
Elizabeth Griggs, general manager
The Avenue of the Peninsula
Stoltz Management
Condos won't save retail
To the Editor:
I read Mike Giglia's letter that appeared in last weeks Feb. 7 issue
of the PV News with mixed reaction. I am sympathetic to Giglia’s
desire to grow his business, but I am taken aback at what he is
prepared to sacrifice (increased commute traffic, parking overflow)
in order to achieve the promised retailing gain from the
condominiums.
Most important here is the fact that Giglia apparently doesn’t
understand the economics of local vs. regional shopping centers well
enough to know if the developers' promises are real.
Silver Spur began as a local shopping area. It was turned into a
regional shopping center when The Courtyard was built in the early
1980s. This shift in center type is important, because the shift
from local to regional requires a much larger customer base.
Regional shopping centers focus on less frequent but more
dollar-intensive shopping - clothes, perfume, housewares and other
medium to high-ticket items. But those larger ticket items are
usually purchased in fewer shopping trips. Larger per-visit
spending, but fewer trips. Thus, for the regional business model to
work (generate revenue sufficient to cover the regional center's
costs), it needs a larger customer base. And if this base isn’t
there, nothing works well. It is instructive that several excellent
anchor retailers have tried our Silver Spur center; and all have
failed. From this, a reasonable person could conclude that the
original developers simply made a mistake, and the regional center
at Silver Spur requires more customer base than the Peninsula
provides. The economic study commissioned by the city appears to
agree with this observation. Thus, the developer-presented idea that
the customer base represented by “a few new condos” will save the
Silver Spur retailers just doesn’t wash.
Giglia would have us buy the developers' notion that “... if we
build them (the condominiums),” salvation will come. I don’t think
so. Destructive complications in commute traffic, parking and ghetto
potential are evident and palpable, while the argument in favor (it
will save our retailers) doesn’t appear to have much substance. And
I find the “so what” attitude about trashing our RHE rural
environment repugnant.
Richard Conway
Rolling Hills Estates
Visit
the PV News website at: http://www.pvnews.com/local_news/